🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.